Camel Tail
A prime example of problematic authorship in self-generating text can be found in Sonny Rae Tempest’s “Camel Tail”-- a piece where author Sonny Rae Tempest takes lyrics from Metallica songs, and works them through software developed by Nick Montfort. The question readers and DHers alike have found themselves facing is “who truly owns ‘Camel Tail?’” Considering all this, is the computer itself an artist having brought Sonny Rae Tempest’s idea to life?
If Ownership was a Pie Chart, Who Would Get the Biggest Slice?
Credits: Yellow- Metallica, Red- Sonny Rae Tempest, Blue- Computer |
Which Slices Have the Most Filling?
Since Metallica’s lyrics are chopped up and used one word at a time, their ownership, and thus artistic intentions and connections with the readers are less meaningful. Similarly, Nick Montfort created his software with intentions to make self-generating poetry; out of his artistic context, his inten meaning is lost and substituted with Sonny Rae Tempest’s. Meaning within the self-generated poem is given in two parts: the first is through the maker’s creative intentions and the second is through the readers’ interpretations of the poetry created.
The Ouroboros of the Digital Humanities World
The meaning that gives “Camel Tail” its meaning lies within the work’s readers; to put it plainly, an artist’s audience is diverse and because of this, every member of that audience is going to interpret the piece a little bit differently. Self-generating text has no true, definite meaning, but its readers give the pieces they view meaning by applying what their personal background knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment